Legal Opinion
United States v. Youritan Construction Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 8, 1973No. C 71 1163 ACWPublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW, AND JUDGMENT
WOLLENBERG, District Judge.
INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT
The United States instituted this action on June 16, 1971, pursuant to Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq., alleging that (1) the defendants have engaged in conduct constituting a pattern or practice of resistance to the enjoyment of rights secured by 42 U.S.C. § 3604 and that (2) the defendants have denied a group of persons rights granted by Title VIII, which denial raised an issue of general public importance. The Government’s complaint prays for injunctive and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lane v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Arthur Ray PARHAM, Appellant, v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
- Evers v. DwyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Bill R. Hunter, D/B/A the CourierCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. Salvatore Di Mucci, Robert Di Mucci and Anthony Di MucciCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Bennett Robinson v. 12 Lofts Realty, Inc., and Paul HanleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- John W. Marr and Lucille Marr v. Douglas RifeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. City of Parma, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Kyra Kyles and Lolita Pierce v. J.K. Guardian Security Services, Inc., D/B/A Guardian Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.