Champlin v. Transport Motor Co.

Holcomb, J. —

Respondent sued for damages for failure of appellant to “save him harmless” in an automobile deal.

Prom about January 5, 1932, respondent was employed as an automobile salesman by appellant, which is a corporation having its principal place of business in Spokane, Washington. At that time, respondent was the owner of an Oakland automobile in good condition, which he had used in calling upon prospects in the business of appellant, and likewise for family use.Owing to the almost total collapse of business generally in the automobile business in and around Spokane in 1932,…