Legal Opinion

Daprato Statuary Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided October 31, 1938No. 4152Published

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court, Third Division.

Merchandise, consisting of marble slabs (over one and one-half inches and not over two inches in thickness), an ornamental wall facade (in chief value of marble), mosaic panels (composed wholly or in chief value of glass), panels of Venetian mosaics (composed wholly or in chief value of glass), and an arch (in chief value of onyx), which, when assembled after importation, composed an ornamental wall facade or reredos, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York under the Tariff Act of 1930…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daprato Statuary Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Hogue v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API