Legal Opinion

Hogue v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1926No. 2668PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHatfield, Judge

Merchandise, described in the entry as “one. (1) case bronze church ornaments” and consisting of a sanctuary lamp composed of metal and plated with gold, was assessed for duty by the collector at 60 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 399 of the Tariff Act of 1922, the pertinent part of which reads as follows:

Par. 399. Articles or wares not specially provided for, if composed wholly or in chief value of platinum, gold, or silver, and articles or wares plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, whether partly or wholly manufactured, 60 per centum ad valorem; * * *

*588It…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Decorated Metal Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John Horvath Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Express Forwarding & Storage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Giuseppe Tommasi Studios v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1938
  4. Maher v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Daprato Statuary Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API