Legal Opinion

Daprato Statuary Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 11, 1928No. 3057PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

A marble, mosaic, inlaid floor, in 16 colors, imported at New York in a knocked-down condition and subsequently installed in St. Mary’s Catholic Church at Dayton, Ohio, was classified by the collector of customs as a manufacture of marble and assessed for duty at 50 per centum ad valorem under that part of paragraph 233 of the Tariff Act of 1922 which reads as follows:

233. Marble, breccia, onyx, alabaster, and jet, wholly or partly manufactured into monuments, benches, vases, and other articles, and articles of which these substances or any of them is the component material of chief value * *…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. John Horvath Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Lea's v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. Express Forwarding & Storage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. Acme Marble & Granite Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Maher v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API