Dow Chemical Co. v. Curtis
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
In 1974, while on strike against the Dow Chemical Company, 486 of Dow’s employees arranged with other employers to perform interim jobs which lasted, on the average, less than two days, for the purpose of qualifying for unemployment compensation. While the strike was still in progress and claims by the 486 employees for unemployment benefits were pending before the Michigan Employment Security Commission, the *475Legislature amended1 §29(8), the labor dispute disqualification provision of the Michigan Employment Security Act,2 and made clear that similarly situated claimants are ineligible. In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mark Hopkins, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- ROMAN CLEANSER COMPANY v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Talley v. Unemployment Compensation Division of the Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Dow Chemical Co. v. CurtisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by16 opinions
- Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
- Haney v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Lee v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. AsmundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.