Legal Opinion

Dow Chemical Co. v. Curtis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1988No. 80516, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

In 1974, while on strike against the Dow Chemical Company, 486 of Dow’s employees arranged with other employers to perform interim jobs which lasted, on the average, less than two days, for the purpose of qualifying for unemployment compensation. While the strike was still in progress and claims by the 486 employees for unemployment benefits were pending before the Michigan Employment Security Commission, the *475Legislature amended1 §29(8), the labor dispute disqualification provision of the Michigan Employment Security Act,2 and made clear that similarly situated claimants are ineligible. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mark Hopkins, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Great Lakes Steel Corp. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
  3. ROMAN CLEANSER COMPANY v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Talley v. Unemployment Compensation Division of the Industrial Accident BoardIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Dow Chemical Co. v. CurtisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Haney v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lee v. Job Service North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. AsmundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Empire Iron Mining Partnership v. OrhanenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API