Legal Opinion

CURTIS v. CITY OF NEWARK

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 31, 2024No. 2:19-cv-17499Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY REGINALD CURTIS, Civil Action No.: 2:19-cv-17499 Plaintiff, v. OPINION CITY OF NEWARK, JOHN DOES (1-10), JANE DOES (1-10), ABC CORPORATIONS (1-10), JOINTLY, SEVERALLY, INDIVIDUALLY, Defendants. CECCHI, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendant City of Newark’s (“Defendant”) motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 47. Plaintiff Reginald Curtis (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition (ECF No. 50) to Defendant’s motion, and Defendant replied (ECF No. 51). At the Court’s request (ECF No. 42), the parties filed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Richard Conoshenti v. Public Service Electric & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. Lichtenstein v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  5. VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API