Legal Opinion

Sutton v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1995No. A066714PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MERRILL, J.

Following an accident with an underinsured motorist, plaintiffs Michael and Mary Sutton who held three separate automobile insurance policies on three separate vehicles with defendant Farmers Insurance Exchange (Farmers), unsuccessfully sought coverage under the policy with the highest underinsured motorist liability limit. Thereafter, plaintiffs filed the instant action for declaratory relief. Following trial, the trial court entered judgment in their favor and Farmers has appealed. For reasons which follow we reverse the judgment.

I

According to the record, on April 30,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance BureauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Barrett v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. Hartford Casualty Insurance v. CancillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Public Employees Insurance v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Julian v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Julian v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API