Legal Opinion

Harold Furnace Co. v. Junglas

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court

Decided April 4, 1949No. 578588PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*10MEMORANDUM OPINION

By BLYTHIN, J.

The parties hereto waived trial by jury and submitted the issue in this cause to the court.

For some time prior to a date about December 16, 1946 defendant Junglas had been employed by the plaintiff Furnace-Company as a mechanic on an hourly rate pay-basis. About, the last mentioned date this employment was terminated and Junglas became a salesman of furnaces and parts on a. commission basis. Under date of January 1, 1947 the salesman-on-commission employment arrangement was set forth in a written instrument designated as a “Salesman Contract”' signed by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richmond Dry Goods Co. v. WilsfnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Anagnosti v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  3. Weinstein-Goodkind, Inc. v. DonovanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Agnew v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Selig v. BergmanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bade v. DuffyOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Miller v. LevyOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Marburger v. Eastwood Chrysler-PlymouthOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API