Harold Furnace Co. v. Junglas
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
1Opinion of the Court
*10MEMORANDUM OPINION
By BLYTHIN, J.
The parties hereto waived trial by jury and submitted the issue in this cause to the court.
For some time prior to a date about December 16, 1946 defendant Junglas had been employed by the plaintiff Furnace-Company as a mechanic on an hourly rate pay-basis. About, the last mentioned date this employment was terminated and Junglas became a salesman of furnaces and parts on a. commission basis. Under date of January 1, 1947 the salesman-on-commission employment arrangement was set forth in a written instrument designated as a “Salesman Contract”' signed by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richmond Dry Goods Co. v. WilsfnWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
- Anagnosti v. AlmyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Weinstein-Goodkind, Inc. v. DonovanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1933
3Cited by5 opinions
- Agnew v. CameronCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Selig v. BergmanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Bade v. DuffyOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Miller v. LevyOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Marburger v. Eastwood Chrysler-PlymouthOhio Court of Appeals · 1991