Weinstein-Goodkind, Inc. v. Donovan
City of New York Municipal Court
1Opinion of the CourtRyan, J.
After having given this matter careful consideration I am of the opinion the defendant should prevail. The complaint alleges an agreement dated February 18, 1931, which at the .trial was received in evidence, the purport of which was that the plaintiff employed defendant as a salesman on a commission basis and agreed to advance to the defendant $2,000, payable in four installments, between February 1 and April 15, 1931, against commissions for the spring of 1931. The agreement further provided that “ A statement should be drawn on and after May 1 and any differences of commissions are to be…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Harold Furnace Co. v. JunglasCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1949