Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. Yorba

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1908No. Civ. No. 470PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. George H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission for services alleged to have been performed in making a sale of certain lands owned by defendant and his sister.

It is alleged that the employment was by a written instrument subscribed by defendant, whereby defendant employed plaintiff’s assignor, T. G. Yorba, to sell certain real estate situated in Orange county, California, known as the Yorba Ranch, and consisting of lots one to six, inclusive, of the Trinidad Yorba Estate, as shown by a certain map of the Rancho Canon de Santa Ana, and whereby defendant also agreed to pay said…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marriner v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Grant v. EdeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lindley v. FayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Crane v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  2. C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kleinsorge & Heilbron v. LinessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Henderson v. LemkeOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Pray v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API