Legal Opinion
McCann for Use of Osterman v. Continental Cas. Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided September 13, 1955No. Gen. 46,604PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. PRESIDING JUSTICE MoCORMICK
delivered the opinion of the court.
An action in garnishment was instituted against the defendant, Continental Casualty Company, a corporation, based upon a judgment recovered by the plaintiff against one Donald McCann. The defendant by its policy insured one William J. Kenealy, who was the owner of a motor scooter. By a special endorsement to the policy, the coverage was limited to the named insured and those relatives who were members of his household. One Donald McCann, not a relative and not a member of the household, while using the scooter with the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Farm Bureau Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Moscov v. Mutual Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WolbarstSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1948
- Landis Ex Rel. Talley v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1952
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Jenkins v. Mayflower Insurance ExchangeArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Mary Bakke, Johnny Bakke, Jo Lynn Wood, Karla Vigil and Lawrence VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- McCann Ex Rel. Osterman v. Continental Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1956
- Utah Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. ChuggUtah Supreme Court · 1957
- Corbett v. Devon BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.