Legal Opinion

Novosel v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 5, 1980No. Civ. A. 79-73926PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOINER, District Judge.

This action, originally brought in Oakland County Circuit Court, is properly before this court upon a timely filed petition for removal. The plaintiff alleges two causes of action arising out of his termination from employment: wrongful discharge and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The defendant has made a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment.

At the time of his termination, the plaintiff had been a Sears employee for nearly twelve years. He was terminated after a disputed incident in the company parking lot. As the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Warren v. June's Mobile Home Village & Sales, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Frishett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Reid v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Perry v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Dzinglski v. Weirton Steel Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Harrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Therrien v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1987

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API