Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Handy

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 2003No. A03-95PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellants, the child and grandchildren of now deceased medical-assistance recipient Viva Bertha Handy, assert that the district court erred by granting summary judgment to respondent Department of Human Services on its claim against Viva Bertha Handy’s estate to recover medical-assistance payments for her nursing home care. Because the district court correctly determined that appellants did not continuously reside in Viva Bertha Handy’s home from the date of her institutionalization as required under Minn.Stat. § 256B.15, subd. 4 (2000), to limit the state’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  5. Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Doe 175 ex rel. Doe 175 v. Columbia Heights School District, ISD No. 13Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. In Re the Risk Level Determination of G.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. In re the Estate of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, DecedentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
  4. In re the Estate of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, DecedentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023
  5. In re the Estate of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, DecedentCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API