LANE TRUCKING COMPANY v. Haponski
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Plaintiff alleged 'the “trucks, rolling stock and other equipment” were in the State of Florida when defendant took posses'- sáon ‘amid control thereof. There is no allegation or 'contention that the action involves property located in North Carolina and -subj act to' the jurisdiction, of our courts.
Plaintiff’s action is for prohibitory and mandatory injunctive relief. “Injunction is distinctly an equitable remedy, and the well-established principle underlying equity jurisdiction that it is exercised in 'per-sonam, and not in rem, is fully applicable.” 28 Am. Jur., Injunctions § 4; 19 Am.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burton v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Warlick v. H. P. Reynolds & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Temple v. TempleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Stevens v. . CecilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Trinity Methodist Church v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pelham Realty Corp. v. Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981