Legal Opinion

Vaccaro v. Estate of Gorovoy

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 2, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STERN, J.A.D.

This is an appeal from the grant of summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint seeking the recovery of attorney’s fees. Because defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment was granted, we must accept plaintiffs’ contentions that they were retained by defendants to file a zoning application designed to obtain approval for higher density residential construction on Quad Associates’ sixty-two acre property and that the parties orally agreed that a contingency fee would be paid in the amount of “five percent of any increase in the value of the land that would result from a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barr v. DayWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Cohen v. Radio-Electronics Officers Union District 3Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  3. Glick v. Barclays De Zoete Wedd, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  4. Dinter v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  5. Estate of Pinter v. McGeeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Starkey v. Estate of NicolaysenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  2. In Re Safety Components, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  3. United States v. 36.06 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1999
  4. Starkey, Kelly, Blaney & White v. Estate of NicolaysenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API