Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ronald Thompson

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 30, 2013No. 04-13-00127-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by:

MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.

Appellant Ronald Thompson was arrested and charged with twenty-six counts of improper photography or visual recording in violation of section 21.15(b)(1) of the Texas Penal Code, commonly known as the “improper photography” statute. This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of Thompson’s pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus, which alleged section 21.15(b)(1) is unconstitutional on its face because it violates both the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and Article 1, Section 8 of the Texas Constitution. We reverse and remand.

Bac…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Leonardo Nuncio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019
  2. Carter, Ex Parte Justin RiverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Ex Parte Cedric Cornelius Neal, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2020
  4. Ex Parte Justin River Carter, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Ex Parte: Jordan Jones, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API