Legal Opinion

Manigault v. S. M. Ward & Co.

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided June 22, 1903PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONTON, Circuit Judge.

On 3d March, 1903, the General Assembly of South Carolina passed an act to authorize the construction of a dam across Kinloch creek, in Georgetown county. 24 St. at Large, p. 246. The preamble of the act recites the necessity of constructing' a dam across Kinloch creek in order to drain certain lowlands in the county of Georgetown subject to overflow by reason, of high tides and freshets in Santee river; that 'the construction of the *709said dam is the only feasible means of draining said lands; that the lands bordering on said stream are nearly entirely owned or…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. HodurskiSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. United States v. United Shoe Machinery Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1920
  3. Fairchild v. KraemerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Solberg v. DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Washoe County Water Conservation District v. BeemerNevada Supreme Court · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API