Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Foreman v. Nash

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1987No. 64223PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ward

Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 381 (107 Ill. 2d R. 381), the People, on behalf of Fred Foreman, State’s Attorney of Lake County, filed a motion for leave to file a petition for an original writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, for a supervisory order directed to respondents, Honorable William R. Nash, Honorable Philip G. Reinhard, and Honorable George W. Unverzagt, justices of the Appellate Court, Second District; Honorable Lawrence D. Inglis, judge of the circuit court of Lake County; and Steven F. Palmer, defendant herein. We allowed the motion to file the petition.

In the circuit court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People Ex Rel. Fahner v. Carriage Way West, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People Ex Rel. Ward v. MoranIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Madden v. CronsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Daley v. HettIllinois Supreme Court · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Birkett v. KonetskiIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Orenic v. Illinois State Labor Relations BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People Ex Rel. Baker v. CowlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. PalmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People Ex Rel. Birkett v. BakalisIllinois Supreme Court · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API