Legal Opinion

Daley v. Hett

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1986No. 62819, 62820, 62838 consPublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Plaintiff in these original proceedings, Richard M. Daley, State’s Attorney of Cook County, filed three separate motions for leave to file complaints for writs of mandamus or writs of prohibition under Supreme Court Rule 381 (87 Ill. 2d R. 381). The motions seek, in the alternative, supervisory orders under Supreme Court Rule 383 (94 Ill. 2d R. 383). The nominal defendants are Philip J. Carey and Thomas A. Hett, judges of the circuit court of Cook County. We granted plaintiff’s motions and subsequently consolidated the three proceedings upon finding that each presented the same issues.

Each…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Horn v. RinckerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Hughes v. KileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People ex rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ClarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. People v. WolfbrandtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. People v. ShumIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. LucasIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. EricksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. People v. MaxwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API