Legal Opinion

McLane v. . Manning

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1864PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The fiat for an injunction in this case was made by me in vacation. The application for it was presented under such circumstances as to allow me no time for an examination of the authorities bearing upon the questions involved, and very little opportunity for (611) reflection. Having now had the aid of an argument and of a conference with my brethren, I have, after mature consideration, come to the conclusion with them that the order was improvidently granted and that the demurrer must be sustained and the bill dismissed.

It is necessary for us to notice only one or two of the questions raised…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jarman v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
  2. Anderson v. . RaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Jones v. . HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Harshaw v. . McCombs and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1868
  5. Edney v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1847

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Calloway v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Colt v. . KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. J. B. Colt Co. v. KimballSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API