Legal Opinion

Harshaw v. . McCombs and Others

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1868PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill, for the cancellation of a deed, filed to Fall Term 1866' of the Court of Equity for Cheroxee. The bill was subsequently amended, and a demurrer put in; whereupon the demurrer was set down for argument, and the-cause, at Spring Term 1868, was transmitted to this Court by consent.

Read the full summary

Bill, for the cancellation of a deed, filed to Fall Term 1866' of the Court of Equity for Cheroxee. The bill was subsequently amended, and a demurrer put in; whereupon the demurrer was set down for argument, and the-cause, at Spring Term 1868, was transmitted to this Court by consent. The bill alleged that in the year 1865, the plaintiff, in order to induce his only child, a son of sixteen years of age, h> refrain from certain habits and associations into which he had fallen, executed a deed of bargain and sale, conveying to the defendant McCombs all of a large estate, real and personal,, of…

1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.

The bill was filed for the purpose of procuring the cancellation of a certain deed of conveyance therein mentioned. The demurrer presents the question whether the plaintiff has set forth such a case as entitles him to call on the -defendants for an answer.

It is now well settled that the grantor or donor cannot call :in the aid of a Court of Equity to have his deed cancelled, unless he can show that it was obtained from him by surprise or mistake, want of freedom, undue influence, the suggestion of a falsehood, or the suppression of the truth, Gunter v. Thomas, 1 Ire. Eq. 199; Green v.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLane v. . ManningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
  2. Garrow v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
  3. Triplett v. . WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  4. Witherspoon v. . CarmichaelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API