Legal Opinion

Shuping v. Barber

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 1988No. 8719SC611PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

On the sole issue raised in this appeal, plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in entering summary judgment for defendants for the reason that the statements allegedly made by the individual defendants were actionable per se and defendants’ affirmative defenses of privileged communication and governmental immunity are not a bar to plaintiffs claim.

Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and any party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Bernick v. JurdenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. HedrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Clark v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Schlossberg v. GoinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Market America, Inc. v. Christman-OrthCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Gibson v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API