H. K. Toy & Novelty Co. v. Richards
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Industrial Board of Indiana. Proceedings for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Murrel B. Bichardb against the H. K. Toy and Novelty Company. From an award for applicant, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.
Appellee filed her claim against appellant before the Industrial Board of Indiana, under the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, alleging that on August 30, 1916, she received personal injuries by reason of an accident arising out of and in the course of her employment by appellant. On a hearing before the full Industrial Board, appellee was awarded compensation at the rate of $5.50 per week, for a period of fifteen weeks. Appellant appealed and assigned errors on which it seeks a reversal. The evidence tends to establish the following facts, pertinent to the questions presented for our…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Choctaw Portland Cement Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Engle v. Director General of RailroadsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Smith v. BrownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- McCullough v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Tovrea Packing Co. v. TapiaArizona Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.