Legal Opinion

Chew v. Newsome Chevrolet, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 7, 1993No. 2027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge:

This is an action in negligence seeking damages for personal injury. Mary G. Chew sued Newsome Chevrolet, Inc., alleging that she was injured while working as a security guard at Newsome’s automobile dealership. Chew was an employee of Am-Pro Protective Agency, a security service that was under contract with Newsome to provide security for Newsome’s business premises. After answering the complaint, Newsome moved for summary judgment on the ground that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, because Chew was its statutory employee under the South Carolina Workers’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bridges v. Wyandotte Worsted Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1963
  2. Smith v. T.H. Snipes & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Bargesser v. Coleman Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Capital City Insurance v. BP Staff, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
  2. Riden v. Kemet Electronics Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  3. Miller v. WalterNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Brown v. South Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. South Carolina Public Interest Foundation and John Crangle v. Alan Wilson, Attorney General for the State of South CarolinaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API