Legal Opinion
United States v. Harold Evan Grant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 13, 1991No. 90-1397, 90-1398PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Harold Evan Grant (“Grant”) is charged with possession with intent to distribute over one kilogram of phencycli-dine (“POP”), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The United States (the “Government”) appeals from the district court’s March 21, 1990 order suppressing evidence,1 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3731; and its March 8,1990 order releasing Grant on bail, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3145. For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM.
*378I.
A
Based onthe January 18, 1990 suppression hearing testimony of Border Patrol Agent Donald Buechner (“Agent Buech-ner”); Border Patrol…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Derrick L. FosterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Dock RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Steven Angelo WardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Arre KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.