Legal Opinion

Mink v. Grand Rapids, Grand Haven & Muskegon Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1916No. Docket No. 110PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Ottawa; Cross, J. Case by Ralph Mink against the Grand Rapids, Grand Haven & Muskegon Railway Company for the negligent setting of fires which spread upon plaintiff’s land. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff is the owner ox 80 acres of land through which defendant’s railway runs. This suit is brought to recover damages for injury done to the plaintiff’s land and other property by reason of a fire. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the ca,se is brought here by writ of error.

Plaintiff claims that section men employed by defendant were burning brush and other rubbish upon defendant’s right of way; that near the place where the men were burning the brush the land adjoining was covered with a tall, dry marsh grass which was very inflammable and was within a very few feet of where…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Silverstone v. London Assurance Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Krouse v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Allen v. BainbridgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jewell v. Rogers TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API