Legal Opinion
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Federal Election Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 12, 2007No. 06-5014PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
Opinion concurring in the judgment filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the Federal Election Commission. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) sought judicial review of the Commission’s dismissal of CREW’s administrative complaint. The issue is whether CREW has standing to challenge the Commission’s decision.
I
During the 2004 presidential election campaign, Grover Norquist gave Ken Mehlman a list of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Federal Election Commission v. AkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley, Jr., Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ralph Nader v. Federal Election CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Citizens for Responsibility v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Citizens for Responsibility v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021
- Ctzn Respsble WA v. FECCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.