Columbus Ry., Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The plaintiff in error raises thé following legal question in this proceeding, namely: Can a motor transportation company increase the number of vehicles employed in motor transportation service under a certificate theretofore issued upon an affidavit of actual operation on April 28, 1923, in accordance with the provisions of General Code, Section 614-87, without filing an application therefor and giving notice thereof as required by General Code, Section 614-91? This question has been answered in the negative in the case of Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, post, 668,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McLain v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by2 opinions
- Central Ohio Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
- Ohio Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929