Legal Opinion

Columbus Ry., Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1925No. 19103PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The plaintiff in error raises thé following legal question in this proceeding, namely: Can a motor transportation company increase the number of vehicles employed in motor transportation service under a certificate theretofore issued upon an affidavit of actual operation on April 28, 1923, in accordance with the provisions of General Code, Section 614-87, without filing an application therefor and giving notice thereof as required by General Code, Section 614-91? This question has been answered in the negative in the case of Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, post, 668,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McLain v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Central Ohio Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Ohio Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API