Legal Opinion

Ohio Transit Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1929No. 21314Published

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

The Public Utilities Commission, in its order and finding, found that the only operation over the route of the plaintiff in error legally permitted by the Public Utilities Commission was the operation of one seven-passenger bus. This conclusion was correct. All subsequent increases in equipment after the granting upon affidavit of the certificate of public convenience and necessity were illegal and the orders issued by the commission with respect thereto were void. Columbus Ry., Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 113 Ohio St., 634, 150 N. E., 237; Cincinnati Traction Co. v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scioto Valley Ry. & Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Columbus Ry., Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API