Legal Opinion

Casseday v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 25, 2011No. Criminal Action No. 06-329(CKK), Civil Action No. 08-322(CKK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is Petitioner Randall Casseday’s [28] Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. On July 13, 2010, the Court denied-in-part Casseday’s motion, holding in abeyance three claims raised by Casseday pending additional briefing from the government and an evidentiary hearing. 1 Casseday’s three remaining claims are: (1) that his counsel was constitutionally ineffective for disregarding his instructions to file a notice of appeal; (2) that his counsel coerced him into answering…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Casseday v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. United States v. CassedayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API