Legal Opinion

Haire v. Nathan Watson Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 2007No. 2-06-107-CVPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOB McCOY, Justice.

I. Introduction

In three issues, Mark Haire and Karen Haire (collectively the “Haires”) assert that the trial court erred in granting Fug-ro South, Inc.’s (“Fugro”) and Nathan Watson Company’s (“NWC”) motions for summary judgment.

II. Factual and Procedural Background

This is the case of the floundering foundations. In October 2001, the Haires purchased a home at 6202 Snow Ridge Court in the Hunter Pointe subdivision of Arlington. The Haires bought the residence in “as is” condition from Prudential Relocation. Sovereign Homes Corporation (“Sovereign”) built the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Valence Operating Co. v. DorsettTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Southwestern Electric Power Co. v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rice v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. City of Irving v. Seppy, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  4. Clark v. Cotten Schmidt, L.L.P.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  5. Cox v. WASTE MANAGEMENT OF TEXAS, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API