United States v. Neff
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HANNUM, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the defendant’s motion for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C. The defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C., has been abandoned. 1
The defendant, Dr. Martin H. Neff, is a seventy year old licensed physician who has maintained a general practice in the Borough of Downingtown, Pennsylvania since 1929. On May 12, 1971 a jury found Dr. Neff guilty on five counts of selling and delivering various…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. StegmannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- United States v. James Adrian Ambrose, Alias Lilly AmbroseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. SimmsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1980
- United States v. SchallDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- United States v. MunfordDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.