Legal Opinion

United States v. Munford

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1977No. Crim. 76-260PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DITTER, District Judge.

Defendants were convicted by a jury of conspiracy and the illegal possession of 60 ounces of heroin. They seek judgment of acquittal or a new trial asserting their motions to suppress evidence were improperly denied, a violation of Sixth Amendment rights, prosecutorial misconduct, errors in the jury charge, and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain their convictions. For the reasons which follow, defendants’ motions will be denied.

1. The Factual Background

On April 30, 1976, at approximately 3:00 P.M., Agent Walter Wasyluk of the Bureau of Alcohol,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Gaetano ModicaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Donald Lee KappermanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. United States v. GainesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. United States v. PeiferDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API