Humphrey v. Copeland
Supreme Court of Georgia
Husband and wife. Debtor and creditor. Judgments. Judicial sale. Notice. Before Judge Pottle. Hancock Superior Court. October Term, 1874. Reported in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Bleckley, Judge.
- Copeland is but a nominal defendant in the bill. The real defendant is Humphrey. The complainant is Mrs. Copeland, *544wife of Copeland; and the object of the bill is to reclaim from Humphrey a sum of money which her husband paid to him out of her separate estate. Humphrey, the defendant, sold to complainant’s husband some land, and, at the same time, some personal property, taking his notes separately for each, and giving bond to make titles to him for the land on payment for it in full. Shortly aftewards, one of the notes covering the price of the land was partially paid in…
2Cited by27 opinions
- Chason v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. LewmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Farmers State Bank v. KelleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Grant v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Bell v. StewartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.