Legal Opinion

Kurtz v. Faygo Beverages, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2002No. Docket 118723Published

1Opinion of the Court

644 N.W.2d 710 (2002)

466 Mich. 186

Thomas KURTZ, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

FAYGO BEVERAGES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 118723.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 29, 2002.

Bernstein & Bernstein (by William W. Watkinson, Jr.), Southfield, MI, for the plaintiff-appellee.

Charfoos, Reiter, Peterson, Jones, Dorland & Hebert, P.C. (by Myron B. Charfoos), Farmington Hills, MI, for the defendant-appellant.

2Per curiam

In this worker's compensation case, the Worker's Compensation Appellate Commission dismissed plaintiff's appeal because the transcript was not timely filed. The Court of Appeals thereafter…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Williams v. Hofley Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Marrs v. Board of MedicineMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Zielke v. A. J. Marshall Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API