Legal Opinion

In re Jones

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 15, 1846PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The surrogate granted an order requiring the executor to tender an account of his proceedings. The sufficiency of the account as rendered was contested by the petitioner

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate. — What does the order require ? The statute renders the answer to this question plain. The order itself speaks for itself. Its mandate is that the executor do render an account of his proceedings as executor. Its comprehensiveness has its foundations in its simplicity. It reaches every part of his administration by the force of the terms used. An analysis of the statutes shows the design of the order to be as far reaching as its language imports. The *26552d section (2 Rev. Stat., 1 ed., 92), confers jurisdiction upon the surrogate to require an account of proceedings of an executor…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gratacap v. PhyfeNew York Court of Chancery · 1846

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Underhill v. NewburgerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1881
  2. Martine's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882
  3. Greene v. DayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1882
  4. Bowne v. LangeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1886
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of HammerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API