Legal Opinion

Bowne v. Lange

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 15, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Hearing of objections interposed by William R Bowne, an alleged creditor of decedent, to the account filed by Louise Lange, executrix of his will, in proceedings for judicial settlement.

1Opinion of the Court

The Surrogate.

In response to a citation issued herein at' the petitioner’s instance, the executrix of this estate has filed an account of her administration. She now asks that that account be approved and passed, notwithstanding certain objections interposed thereto by the petitioner. She insists that she disputed and rejected the petitioner’s claim in February, 1884, more than six months before any proceeding was taken for its enforcement, and that accordingly, by virtue of § 1822 of the Code of Civil Procedure, *351the petitioner is forever barred from compelling its payment and must be treated…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Hoyt v. . BonnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Lambert v. . CraftNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Magee v. VedderNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  5. In re JonesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1846

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Strickland's EstateNew York Surrogate's Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API