Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Hammer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 15, 1916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Peoceedis-gs for the judicial settlement of the administrator’s account.

1Opinion of the Court

Schulz, S.

—The public administrator of the county of Bronx has brought this proceeding for a judicial settlement of his account as administrator of the goods, etc., of the decedent. The secretary and chancellor of' the consulate general of Italy at Hew York filed objections to two items; one set forth in schedule C of the account and stated to be for “ miscellaneous expenses necessarily incurred in connection with- the administration of the estate,” and the other contained in schedule E of ttie account as to which the objection is that it includes “ a charge of $39.73 for administrator’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of WorthingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Knapp v. . the City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Matter of Alter'g, Etc., Main St., Sing SingNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of FurnissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. In re JonesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1846

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re MITTLEMANNDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API