Young's Sales v. Underground Storage Tank
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
AND NOW, this 19th day of January, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:
In a question of first impression not previously determined by this Court, does the Commonwealth Court’s holding that eligibility for recovery from the Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Fund is on a “per tank” basis misinterpret the purpose of and misapply both federal and state laws requiring mandatory financial responsibility for underground storage tanks and threaten the overall financial sustainability of the Fund itself?
Petitioner’s Application…
3Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
4Cited by2 opinions
- Young's Sales & Service v. Underground Storage Tank Indemnification BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Young's Sales & Service v. Underground Storage Tank Indemnification BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013