Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Young's Sales & Service v. Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 2013Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Saylor

I agree that the Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Board’s adjudication should be reinstated. However, I reach this conclusion based on the nature of the claim that was submitted to the Fund, and not on the premise that Section 706 implicitly incorporates the statute’s definition of “underground storage tank” into its substantive provisions. Therefore, I cannot join the reasoning of the Opinion Announcing the Judgment of the Court (“OAJC”).

As the Commonwealth Court correctly observed, Section 706 of the Storage Tank and Spill Prevention Act speaks in terms of individual tanks. See…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. O'ROURKE v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. American Petroleum Institute v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  4. Young's Sale & Service v. Underground Storage Tank Indemnification BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Young's Sales v. Underground Storage TankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API