Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 19, 2011No. 375 WAL 2010, 376 WAL 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

AND NOW, this 19th day of January 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue, as stated by Petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court’s reliance on 42 Pa.C.S. § 9754 in its holding in Commonwealth v. Vilsaint, 893 A.2d 753 (Pa.Super.2006) and Commonwealth v. MacGregor, 912 A.2d 315 (Pa.Super.2006) that only the court, and not probation officers, can impose the terms of probation is in conflict with 42 Pa.C.S. § 9798.3, enacted in 2007, which directs that the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and County probation authorities in Megan’s Law may impose…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MacGregorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. VilsaintSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Young's Sales v. Underground Storage TankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API