Legal Opinion
Washkoviak v. Student Loan Marketing Ass'n
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 2004No. 03-CV-344PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
On March 4, 2003, the trial judge issued an order dismissing this action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A copy of the judge’s order is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The three plaintiffs appeal, reiterating the contentions that they raised in the trial court. With a single modification, we adopt the well-reasoned opinion of the trial judge as the opinion of this court.1 With respect to the plaintiffs’ first claim, i.e., that the defendant Student Loan Marketing Association (Sallie Mae) unlawfully failed to disclose material…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Washkoviak v. Student Loan Marketing Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Zuurbier v. Medstar Health, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Rufus and Delores Stancil v. First Mount Vernon Industrial Loan AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Rufus and Delores Stancil v. First Mount Vernon Industrial Loan AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Washkoviak v. Student Loan Marketing Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006