Saigh v. Monteith, C.J.
Texas Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Smedlby
I respectfully dissent from that part of the opinion of the majority in which the Court takes jurisdiction of and decides the question whether the plaintiff in trial court, respondent here, can maintain venue in Harris County under Subdivision 5 of Article 1995 by reason of the written contract dated March 24, 1944. The reason for this dissent is that this Court is wholly without jurisdiction of that question.
As shown by the copy of the transcript from the District Court, respondent Anderson Brothers Corporation, in response to relator’s plea of privilege to be sued in the county of his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
- Tunstill v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- Garitty v. RaineyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- Railroad Commission v. MacKhank Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
- Jackson v. McClendonTexas Supreme Court · 1945
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.