Legal Opinion

Tunstill v. Scott

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1942No. 7806PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge Smedley

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.

The Court of Civil Appeals for the second district has certified to- this court two questions arising' from two- orders overruling pleas o-f privilege.

The facts stated in the certificate and shown by the transcript are in substance as follows: Appellee, Naomi Scott, filed suit in a district court of Tarrant County against appellants W. A. Tunstill and wife, Eula Tunstill, and G. G. Tunstill, alleged to be residents of Tarrant County, and G. A. Tunstill, alleged to be temporarily residing in Harris County.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. De La Vega v. LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Shell Petroleum Corp. v. GraysTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Craig v. Pittman & Harrison Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  5. Pena v. SlingTexas Supreme Court · 1940

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Morgan v. Compugraphic Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Cowden v. CowdenTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  5. WTFO, INC. v. Braithwaite, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API