Legal Opinion

Sonsmith v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1912No. Docket No. 48PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Kendrick, J. Case by George Sonsmith against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, C. J.

On the 29th of November, 1909, the stone run train, so called, consisting of 35 or 36 cars, was made up on the main track of the Bad Axe Division of defendant’s road; the track running substantially east and west. The plaintiff was employed by the defendant as an extra brakeman, and was assigned to duty on the stone run train. Some time between 4 and 5 o’clock in the morning of November 29th, he reported himself at the yards, arriving there before the locomotive arrived, or any of the trainmen connected with his run. The train was equipped with air brakes and automatic couplers. It was made…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Holgate v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Nabozny v. HamilMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Fernette v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API