Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hay v. Isetts

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Frank W. Isetts, and his wife, Emilie I. Isetts, joined by her husband, Frank W. Isetts, for the purpose of the suit, instituted proceedings against D. Krokover and his wife, Paulina Krokover (also known as Pauline Krokover) joined by her husband, D. Krokover, for the purpose of the suit, Mary G. Hay joined by her husband, William R. Hay, for the purpose of the suit, William R. Hay, Percy C. Pachtman, Florence Goldsmith joined by her husband, __________…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Phifer v. AbbottSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Henry Vogt Machine Co. v. Milton Land & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. McJunkins v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  4. Buck v. All Parties Claiming Interest in the Property Involved as Heirs, Devisees, Grantees or Other Under MitchelSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  5. Armour Fertilizer Works v. N. G. Wade Investment Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thursby v. StewartSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. Moffitt v. WillisSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Rich v. RyalsSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
  4. Gover v. MannSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Walker Fert. Co., Inc. v. RaceSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API