Legal Opinion
Gover v. Mann
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 3, 1934PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.
— In this, case a motion by appellee to quash the appeal was heretofore denied without opinion. Subsequently a motion for rehearing was filed and a rehearing granted, so that the sufficiency of the entry of appeal could be re-examined in the light of what was said in the opinion of this Court in Hay v. Isetts, 98 Fla. 1026, 125 Sou. Rep. 237.
Section 11890, Acts of 1927, Laws of Florida (now Section 4635 C. G. L), reads as follows:
“No writ of error or appeal shall be dismissed for want of proper parties if the writ of error or notice of entry of appeal recorded within the time allowed by law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rabinowitz v. HoukSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Hay v. IsettsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
- Gibbs v. EwingSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Clark v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Auburn Automobile Co. v. Namor Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Crenshaw Bros. Produce Co., Inc. v. HarperSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Kelly v. KnottSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- State v. County of CitrusSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Gardner v. Northern Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
- In Re Estate of LoftinSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.