Legal Opinion

Buck v. All Parties Claiming Interest in the Property Involved as Heirs, Devisees, Grantees or Other Under Mitchel

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 20, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The appellant exhibited his bill in chancery-in the Circuit Court for Franklin County on the 2nd day of May, 1921, against “all parties claiming interest in the property involved, as heirs, devisees, grantees or other claimant, under the following named persons deceased, to-wit: Colin Mitch el, Robert Mitch el, Peter Mitch el and John Camochan individually, and as trustees for creditors of Camochan & Mitchel, Thomas Yermilya, William Calder, Richard Camochan, James Innerarity, Benjamin Marshall, Benjamin W. Rogers, John McNish, John Graham, John P. Williamson, Stephen Cambreling and Abel T.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Andreu v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  2. Garrison v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  3. Lowe v. DeLaneySupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  4. Hodges v. MooreSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  5. Continental National Building & Loan Ass'n v. MillerSupreme Court of Florida · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eristavitchitcherine v. Miami Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. McJunkins v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  3. Hay v. IsettsSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. Brooks v. Miami Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Provident Savings Bank and Trust Co. v. DevitoSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API