Van Every v. Van Every
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The plaintiff has appealed from an adverse judgment on the pleadings. The motion for such judgment is in the nature of a demurrer, allowable against the plaintiff only when the complaint as modified by the reply fails to allege facts sufficient to state a cause of action or admits facts which constitute a complete legal bar thereto. When all facts necessary to establish the plea in bar are either alleged or admitted in the plaintiff’s pleadings, it becomes the duty of the court to pass on the plea as a matter of law. McFarland v. Publishing Co., 260 N.C. 397, 132 S.E. 2d 752; Erickson v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Archbell v. . ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Kiger v. KigerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. Crab Orchard Development CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- CommScope Credit Union v. Butler & Burke, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
- Rosenthal v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Minor v. MinorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.